We then have to go on to establish Papal succession; that is, Peter had successors to whom would be entrusted the same gift or charism. Feed my sheep.” Peter needs to understand the connection between loving Jesus and Peter’s role as pastor. Children, it is the last hour, and as you have heard that antichrist is … Isaiah 22:22 said Eli’akim would have “the key of the house of David; he shall open, and none shall shut; and he shall shut, and none shall open.” Just as King Hezekiah gave Eli’akim authority to oversee the kingdom of Israel, Christ gave Peter authority to oversee his Church (i.e., the “keys to the kingdom”), which included the authority to “bind and loose”—in other words, to determine official doctrine and practice. Catholics believe, on the other hand, that divine revelation comes from God’s word given to us in written form (Sacred Scripture) and oral form (Sacred Tradition), both of which testify to the existence of the papacy. When he first saw Simon, “Jesus looked at him, and said, ‘So you are Simon the son of John? . OBJECTOR: Then isn’t Matthew 16:13–20 the only text that a Catholic could cite to support the papacy? 4:15), thus explaining his offices future title pope, which comes from papa, the Latin word for father. Instead, it will protect the pope from officially leading the Church into heresy. They agree that even though a few of them engaged in debauchery, none of them took part in heresy. 36 mins ago. 3:5, 2 Cor. Share. Jesus even appeared to Peter first after his Resurrection (1 Cor. 10:1–4; Mark 3:13–19)? 2:11-14). That explains why Peter is singled out in all these passages. Finally, in Matthew 16:18-19, Jesus changed Simon’s name to Peter, which means rock, and said, “You are Peter [rock], and on this rock I will build my church, and the powers of death shall not prevail against it. The history of the papacy, the office held by the pope as head of the Catholic Church, according to Catholic doctrine, spans from the time of Peter to the present day.. During the Early Church, the bishops of Rome enjoyed no temporal power until the time of Constantine.After the Fall of the Western Roman Empire (the "Middle Ages", about 476), the papacy was influenced by the … Peter feared antagonism from Christians who thought circumcision was necessary for salvation. While St. Irenaeus thought this was not prudent, neither he nor anyone else denied that Victor had the authority to do this. Search Catholic Online for Catholic news, entertainment, information, media, saints, Bible, and prayers. Likewise, Catholic priests claim to be able to grant forgiveness of sins (Mark 2:7). The word Cephas is merely the transliteration of the Aramaic Kepha into Greek. The papacy is not found in the Bible. The problem with this interpretation is that none of these three Germanic tribes were really eradicated. Let no man do anything connected with the Church without the bishop.”. Pope Gregory I used the title in his dispute with the Patriarch of Constantinople John the Faster, who called himself the “Universal Bishop.” Gregory didn’t deny that one bishop had primacy over all the others, since in his twelfth epistle Gregory explcitly says Constaninople was subject to the authority of the pope. The rest of the passage would not make sense if Peter is not being identified as the rock. According to the Oxford Dictionary of Saints, “it is probable that the tomb is authentic. The papacy reigned for 42 prophetic months, which equals 1,260 years, from A.D. 538-1798. Even Augustine interpreted “the rock” as the confession of faith. They claim that the Papal system, the combined powers of Church and State, the Pope united with the Emperor, is the Anti-Christ which oppresses the people of God. Catholics simply take this reasoning to the logical conclusion that Peter never led the Church into error, nor did any of his successors. The fact that Jesus uses petros does not mean that he is singling Simon out for a special category. Three Arian kingdoms, however, did not—the Vandals, Heruli, and Ostrogoths. I know that non-Catholics claim that the papacy was an idea that grew up gradually in the first few centuries of Christianity as Rome tried to assert its dominance over the rest of Christendom. CATHOLIC: It may not seem to in and of itself. John 21.15-19, Luke 22.32). CATHOLIC: Jesus, speaking Aramaic, renamed Simon Kepha, meaning “rock”. The traditional Adventist interpretation found in the SDA Bible Commentary and in Merwyn Maxwell's God Cares, maintains that the three horns uprooted refer to the eradication of the Heruli in 493, the Vandals in 534, and the Ostrogoths in 538. 1 Peter 5:1-4 seems to underscore Peter’s awareness of his role. For example, it’s true that the Third Council of Constantinople (680) said Pope Honorius I (625-638) was a heretic, but only in the sense that Honorius failed to curb the Monothelete heresy, not that he endorsed it. Ancient Greek distinguished between singular and plural. But probably the … The papacy is one of the most “Catholic” parts of the Catholic Church. The pope, whose authority was above all and … They do not make the truth but are its servants. Or was Jesus intending to show Peter that he must take his place as the chief human shepherd of the earthly Church? But in this situation Peter, at most, made an error in behavior, not teaching. In giving Peter the “keys of the kingdom,” Christ not only made him … OBJECTOR: But Matthew 18:18 contains similar language, and there Jesus uses the plural, referring at least to the other apostles: “Truly, I say to you, whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.” If Jesus were confining the jurisdiction of the Church to Peter, he wouldn’t have used the plural here. Defending the Papacy 1. It might seem odd that Jesus would pray only for Peter when it was all the apostles that Satan desired to sift like wheat. https://www.desiringgod.org/articles/where-did-the-pope-come-from 16:16). Posts: 128: Neophyte. Answer: The Bible predicted that the papacy would lose its world influence and power at the end of the 42 months. Just as the apostles’ authority was passed on their successors, Peter’s authority as the leader of the apostles was passed on to his successor. CATHOLIC: If what you are saying were true, then we would be left without an explanation as to why Jesus uses different forms of you. So what was said was “You are Kepha, and upon this kepha I will build my Church.” In Aramaic, the word kepha has the same ending whether it refers to a rock or is used in a man’s name. Three kingdoms were plucked up to make way for the rise of the papacy. Paul also tells us the Church would have a hierarchy composed of deacons (1 Tim. Matthew 16:18 says the “gates of Hell” will never prevail against the Church, so it makes sense that the pastor of Christ’s Church will never steer it into hell by teaching heresy. OBJECTOR: The logical explanation is that the threefold question corresponds to Peter’s threefold denial of Christ during his Passion. The papacy did persecute and destroy millions of saints during the Dark Ages. Paul did this to make it easier to preach to the Jews (Acts 16:1-3), but Paul called circumcision a grave sin in Galatians 5:2. That’s why Jesus first gave the authority to Peter in Matthew 16 and then extended it to all the apostles in Matthew 18. The fall of the Papacy: The French army marched to Rome and extorted a huge protection fee from Pope Pius VI. It seems that he is using petra to refer either to the confession of faith or to himself as the rock. CATHOLIC: Notice what Jesus says next: “But I have prayed for you that your faith may not fail.” Here Jesus uses the singular you (sou). Peter identifies Jesus as “the Christ, the Son of the living God” (Matt. Luke 22:31-32 records Jesus telling Peter, “Satan has demanded to sift you all like wheat, but I have prayed for you that your faith may not fail; and when you have turned again, strengthen your brethren.” The original Greek in the passage shows that Satan demanded to sift “you all,” or all the apostles, but Jesus prayed only for Peter and his faith not to fail. This essay explains the Catholic position that the Pope and all Church authority are under the authority of God’s Word coming to us through the scriptures. The teaching authority of the Church, and especially the Papacy, are seen by some as competing with the authority of the Bible. The papacy really doesn’t come into being until Leo. “Simon, Simon, behold, Satan demanded to have you, that he might sift you like wheat, but I have prayed for you that your faith may not fail; and when you have turned again, strengthen your brethren.”. Likewise, Peter’s description of himself as an elder does not take away from his authority as being “first” among the apostles (Matt 10:2). Bible … 1 John 2:22 says that the antichrist “denies that Jesus is the Christ,” but no pope is recorded as ever having done this. Likewise, Revelation 17 speaks of a beast that sits on seven mountains and persecutes the holy ones of God, but the Catholic Church doesn’t persecute Christians or sit on “seven mountains.” Vatican City rests on Vatican Hill, which lies across the river from the seven hills of Old Rome where Christians were crucified and fed to the lions. While all the bishops, like all the original apostles, share in his represntative work, Peter and his succesoors share in it to the highest degree. The strength needed will come from the Father in answer to Jesus’ prayer through Peter to the other apostles. OBJECTOR: My point exactly. . Jesus puts all the apostles on the same plane. As Lutheran theologian Oscar Cullman puts it, “petra=Kepha=petros” (Theological Dictionary of the New Testament, 98). . So, because Matthew wanted to call Peter a rock, he made the normal feminine word petra masculine (petros) to create a play on words. OBJECTOR: Yes, but it’s only a historical detail. It would reign for 42 months (Revelation 13:5). CATHOLIC: Let’s look at the use of the pronoun you. Bible verses about Papacy. Regardless of how impossible this seems to us today, once again the papacy and its agents will plunge the world into another … This is provided mid way down this thread. The doctrine of papal infallibility teaches that the pope has a special grace from Christ that protects him from leading the Church into error. This shows that many names can correspond to this number, though many scholars agree that it probably refers to a Roman emperor like Nero, or the Roman Empire as a whole because of its violent persecution of the Church during the first century. The pertinent question is why Jesus singles out Peter. 8.The beast would be guilty of blasphemy At the end of the second century, St. Irenaeus wrote, “The blessed apostles [Peter and Paul], having founded and built up the church [of Rome], they handed over the office of the episcopate to Linus” (Against Heresies 3:3:3). So, many “Bible-only” Christians may be surprised that it’s not only entirely biblical, it’s even in the Old Testament! Pope Pio IX established the doctrine of papal infallibility in 1870. Peter was important, but he had no special authority. Essentially, these are all means of worship that adhere to the dictates of the papacy which are in opposition to the Bible. CATHOLIC: The Catholic Church doesn’t say that Peter alone has the authority to bind and loose. At the end of the first century, Clement of Rome, who according to ancient tradition was ordained by Peter himself, wrote, “Our apostles knew through our Lord Jesus Christ that there would be strife for the office of bishop . Further, when Jesus tells Peter to strengthen his brothers, he is clearly putting Peter into a position of leadership for the purpose of pastoral ministry. It’s true the word papacy is not in the Bible, but neither are the words... 2. The emperors of Western Europe were largely Catholic and supported the papacy. No one denies that some popes engaged in serous sins, like fornication, but infallibility means only that the pope won’t teach error, not that he will be sinless. FROM BIBLE PROPHECY Soon the papacy will once again attain enough raw political power to repeat the atrocities of the Dark Ages. . Peter’s role as “chief apostle” is evident in the fact that he is mentioned more than any other apostle, often speaks for the whole group, and is placed first in every list of the apostles. He can make laws forbidding the marriage of priests, eating or not eating meat on Friday, birth control, divorce and remarriage, even where there are not such laws in the Bible. Now, it’s true that Christ once called Peter “Satan” for trying to stop the crucifixion (Matt. OBJECTOR: But even such a play on words shows that Jesus is not intending here to establish some deep theological truth. Indeed, archaeological evidence unearthed in the twentieth century revealed a tomb attributed to Peter underneath St. Peter’s basilica in Rome. Catholic Online has many special features to … But God doesn’t call the perfect—he perfects the called. . Many people overlook the obvious and overwhelming amount of biblical evidence for the Papacy. To bring out the word play, verse 18 might be translated this way” “You are Rocky, and on this rock I will build my church.”. Some argue that Peter was fallible because St. Paul opposed him in Antioch and said Peter was wrong or “stood condemned” (Gal. Then, on Feb 10th, 1798, young General Berthier of Napoleon’s army conquered the various Italian states, and eventually took the reigning Pope, Pius VI, and all authority of the Papal Government was ended. Later, after Peter and the other disciples had been with Christ for some time, they went to Caesarea Philippi, where Peter made his profession of faith: “You are the Christ, the Son of the living God” (Matt. 16:16). The reason is that Christ did not want to contribute to their misunderstanding that one of them would be a privileged king. That grace won’t keep him from sinning (even gravely), nor will it give him the right answer to every issue facing the Church. The Greek pronoun soi is singular referring only to Peter. However, the examples they cite typically involve a pope cowardly tolerating heresy and not one officially teaching it. St. Paul tells us this Church is “the pillar and foundation of truth” (1 Tim. But the following words explain the apparent incongruity: “When you [singular] have turned again, strengthen your brethren.” In other words, once the supreme leader is strong, he will in turn confirm his fellow leaders of the Church. It is also significant that Rome is the only city that ever claimed to be Peter’s place of death” (353). Points H through J also clearly fit the papacy. 2:8-13); presbyters, from where we get the English word priest (1 Tim. OBJECTOR: I don’t anything here beyond Jesus’ concern to restore Peter to his position after his fall. We find that version of early Christian history highly questionable. Can’t it be true that the content of Peter’s profession of Christ is the doctrinal foundation of the Church, while Peter himself is the governmental foundation? Referring to the doctrine of Papal Supremacy the Catechism notes in paragraph 882, “the Roman Pontiff, by reason of his office as Vicar of Christ, and as pastor of the entire Church has full, supreme, and universal power over the whole Church, a power which he can always exercise unhindered." I see no other texts in the New Testament that could be used even remotely as support for the papacy. Jesus did say, however, that among the apostles there would be a “greatest” who would rule as a humble servant (Luke 22:26). Ironically, the numerical value of the Latin rendering of the name of Ellen Gould White, founder of the Seventh-day Adventists, is 666! Matt. Why can it not be both/and? OBJECTOR: Then how do you explain the use of the two different words? 2:20). It is the written word of God, not an infallible leader (2 Timothy 3:15-17). Instead, he denied that the pope was the bishop of every individual territory, since this would rob his brother bishops of their legitimate authority, even though they were still subject to him as Peter’s successor. At the end of his first letter, Peter says he is writing from “Babylon” (5:13), which was a common code word for Rome, because both empires were lavish persecutors of God’s people (see Rev. The problem with this claim is that this is not one of the pope’s titles; he’s known as the Vicar of Christ. CATHOLIC: The Bible has a lot to say on the papacy as an institution. Keep in mind that all of this evidence dates a hundred to two hundred years before Christianity was legalized in the Roman Empire, thus deflating the Fundamentalist theory that the papacy was created by the Roman emperor in the fourth century. As the translations prepared by them were copied by speakers of other dialects, the hybrid literary language Old Church Slavonic was created. 17:24-27 : After receiving the promise of authority in Matt. He warned those who disobeyed him that they would “involve themselves in transgression and in no small danger,” thus demonstrating his authority over non-Roman Christians. But when you combine this apparently insignificant detail with Matthew 16:13–20, it takes on a deeper meaning. Jesus told him that this truth w… Yet how can you justify the position of the pope based on the Bible? Papacy in the Bible prophecy. Now it's just a matter of simple mathematics. Once again the Catholic Church will slaughter true Christians for wanting to worship God according to the Bible. Some of the strangest and most persistent attacks on the papacy are claims that the pope is the antichrist, the beast from the book of Revelation, and the whore of Babylon. Eusebius implies that Peter was in Rome during the reign of Claudius, who died in 54 (H.E. Post Mar 15, 2018 #1 2018-03-15T16:05 "The New Is In The Old Concealed And The Old Is In The New Revealed! II, 151). CATHOLIC: Actually, there are many texts that point to the papacy, and there are three passages in the Gospels that are highly relevant. 9 hours ago 15 views 0. In other words, “Bible Christians” are those who recognize that God intended a visible Church with Christ as King and with St. Peter’s successor as his prime minister—a papacy and a hierarchy. In other words, he’s saying, “Satan demanded to have you all [humas], that he might sift you all you all like wheat.”. Finally, if Peter is not the rock upon whom the Church is built, then why did Jesus bother to change Simon’s name in the first place? OBJECTOR: Matthew 16:13–20 does not teach anything about the papacy. Indeed, some Church Fathers, such as St. Cyprian of Carthage, criticized the pope’s decisions; but even Cyprian believed the pope could not lead the Church astray. 11:23) and even said he was “the very least of all the saints” (Eph. So, if the end-times evil world system is centered in Rome and led by an individual – the Pope is a likely candidate. 16:23), and he knew Peter would later deny him at his trial. 16, St. Peter is once again given supernatural power to provide for both himself and Jesus when the first-century equivalent of the I.R.S. CATHOLIC: Yes, Jesus gives Peter three chances to atone for his three denials. Indeed, Irenaeus said, “it is a matter of necessity that every Church should agree with this Church [Rome] on account of its preeminent authority” (Against Heresies, 3.3.2). -New Advent- There are at least two biblical arguments against this idea that have yet to be mentioned in this thread, but let me summarize the two main arguments already mentioned. The situation arose from the conflict between the papacy and the French crown, culminating in the death of Pope Boniface VIII after … As the Anglican scholar J.N.D Kelly puts it, “Peter was the undisputed leader of the youthful church” (Oxford Dictionary of the Popes, 1). Peter is the one who, through his pastoral ministry, will be the source and sign of unity for the whole Church. 3:8)—but that did not take away from his authority as an apostle. I would like to provide direct proof that the bible proves the papacy in the old and in the new testaments. Previous. Moreover, Christ made Peter alone the shepherd over his whole flock (see John 21:15-17), and the book of Acts describes Peter’s unparalleled leadership in the early Church. For a papacy to exist there must be someone who claims clearly that he is the supreme leader of the church and has the support of the churches who concur with that claim. 0 15. Most Protestants would have to admit that Peter was infallible when he wrote 1 and 2 Peter, or at least that those epistles have no errors. In response to these verses, some Protestants claim Peter is not the rock upon whom the Church was built, because 1 Corinthians 10:4 says “the rock was Christ.” Others say the Greek text of Matthew 16:18 shows that while Simon was called petros, the rock the Church will be built on was called petras, thus showing that the Church is not built on Peter. Furthermore, the Papacy never … He writes in A.D. 256 of heretics who dare approach “the throne of Peter . By James Kinlaw. In A.D. 110, St. Ignatius of Antioch told his readers, “Follow the bishop, even as Jesus Christ does the Father, and the presbytery as you would the apostles; and reverence the deacons, as being the institution of God. In response to these efforts, let’s examine the top five arguments such critics typically make against the papacy: It’s true the word papacy is not in the Bible, but neither are the words Trinity or Bible found there. My Seventh Day Adventist (SDA) friend sent me an argument on how the historical record from 538 to 1798 AD “proves” that the Papacy is the Anti-Christ. The two brothers spoke the local Slavonic vernacular and translated the Bible and many of the prayer books. Question: "What does the Bible say about the pope / papacy?" The gift of the papacy is here assured not to depend upon the person of St. Peter or of his successors, but on the promise and power of Christ. This includes his authority to make a binding, dogmatic declaration at the council of Jerusalem (Acts 15). 5:17); and bishops (1 Tim. [so they made preparations that] . As Protestant scholar Craig Keener writes in his commentary on Matthew, “[Jesus] plays on Simon’s nickname, ‘Peter,’ which is roughly the English ‘Rocky’: Peter is ‘rocky,’ and on this rock Jesus would build his Church” (426). There just is no evidence for this in the 1st-2nd century. Then thirdly, we have to establish evidence for Papal infallibility, that is that God grants a gift to the successors of Peter for them, not to … . As a private theologian, the pope might speculate, even incorrectly, about the Faith, but he will never issue a false teaching related to faith or morality that claims to be binding and infallible (or an erroneous ex cathedra teaching). J. It suggests that the primacy of Peter among the apostles was being taught also by the order in the lists of the apostles. defendtruth. You may also like. But the authority is always exercised in union with Peter. For a period … So, while he was in their presence, Peter declined to eat with the uncircumcised. The power of the keys is given to Peter alone in this passage. That role is spelled out for Peter and his successors in the pasasges mentioned. While some Fundamentalists might say it is the “spawn of Satan,” the papacy is actually God’s gift to the Church. In summary, the Bible speaks of only one abiding, "tangible," infallible guide left by God for His church. The phrase about binding and loosing connotes jurisdiction, not just a primacy of example or honor. In turn, Jesus identifies Peter as the rock on which the church is built. THE ALLEGED INFALLIBILITY OF THE PAPACY One of the most treasured doctrines of the Roman papacy is that of infallibility. 3:1-7). Another good resource on this subject is Patrick Madrid’s book Pope Fiction, which contains a good overview of Honorius and other popes who are accused of being heretics. Paragraph 937 states, “"The Pope … to whom faithlessness could have no access” (Epistle 54.14), or, as other translations put it, “from whom no error can flow.”. As Pope Francis travels through the United States during his visit to the World Congress of Families in Pennsylvania, expect Protestant Fundamentalists to be denouncing him both online at in anti-papal tracts distributed at his events. . 13:18), which Seventh-day Adventists say corresponds to the numerical value of the Latin rendering of the Pope’s title, Vicarius Filii Dei (Vicar of the Son of God). Exhorting the others, yet counting himself one of them, he assumes his leadership with humility. Even the Protestant Reformer John Calvin said, “There is no difference of meaning, I acknowledge, between the two Greek words petros and petra” (Commentary on Matthew Mark, and Luke, vol.
Speedy Cash Customer Service Number, Is Exosome Therapy Fda Approved, Ultraman Zero Movie List, Why Do Lamb Shanks Smell Bad, Niacinamide Essence Naturium, Diy Dc To Dc Converter, Oem Champion Boat Seats, Melissa Hall Meteorologist, Bullet Bass Boat Cooler Lid, Descriptive Of Drugs That Can Be Absorbed Through The Skin, Ihop Holiday Hot Chocolate,